What year did the Children's Crusade take place? Children's Crusade (1212)

Children's crusade- the name of the popular movement of the year, accepted in historiography, which quickly became overgrown with legends.

“It happened right after Easter. We had not yet waited for the Trinity, when thousands of youths set off on their way, leaving their shelter. Some of them were barely born and were only six years old. For others, it was just right to choose a bride for themselves, but they chose exploit and glory in Christ. They have forgotten the worries entrusted to them. They left the plow with which they had recently blown up the earth; they let go of the wheelbarrow that weighed them down; those left the sheep, next to which they fought against the wolves, and thought about other adversaries, the Mohammedan heresy of the strong ... Parents, brothers and sisters, friends persistently persuaded them, but the firmness of the ascetics was unshakable. Having put on the cross and rallied under their banners, they moved to Jerusalem ... The whole world called them madmen, but they went forward. "

On July 25, 1212, Christ's warriors arrived in Speyer. A local chronicler made the following record: “And there was a great pilgrimage, men and virgins, young men and elders, and they were all commoners”.

Plot processing in fiction

• "The Crusade of Children" () - a book of short stories by the French writer Marcel Schwob (Russian translation); Borges was interested in the book, he wrote a preface to it (see:).
• The Children's Crusade is a poem by Martinus Neuhof.
• The Children's Crusade () is a drama by the Romanian writer and philosopher Lucian Blagi.
• "The Gates of Paradise" () - a novel by Jerzy Andrzejewski about the crusade of children, filmed by Andrzej Wajda ()
• "The Crusader in Jeans" () by the Dutch writer Thea Beckman tells how a modern teenager, participating in the tests of a time machine, finds himself in the midst of a children's crusade. In 2006, a film was made based on the book.
• "The Children's Crusade" () - Sting's song.
• The Children's Crusade is the basis of the Franklin J. Schaffner film Lion Heart ().

reminiscences

• Slaughterhouse 5, or the Children's Crusade () is a novel by the American writer Kurt Vonnegut, which tells about the 1945 bombing of the allied forces of Dresden by aircraft.

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010 .

See what the "Children's Crusade" is in other dictionaries:

Children's crusade- ♦ (ENG Children s Crusade) (1212) containing a lot of legendary story describing the march of children from France and West Germany after the fourth crusade (1202 1204) in order to liberate Jerusalem ...

Crusades 1st Crusade Peasant Crusade German Crusade FSU ... Wikipedia

Children "s Crusade- Children's crusade ... Westminster Dictionary of Theological Terms

13th century stained-glass window depicting the Pied Piper. Drawing by Baron Augustine von Mörsperg (1595) ... Wikipedia

This term has other meanings, see Crusader in Jeans (film). Crusader in jeans Kruistocht in spijkerbroek ... Wikipedia

- "Mom" Jones Mary Harris Jones (English Mary Harris Jones, better known as Mom Jones ... Wikipedia

- "Mother" Jones Mary Harris Jones, better known as Mother Jones (August 1, 1837 November 30, 1930), an outstanding trade union and public figure, activist of the Industrial Workers of the world. Contents 1 Biography ... Wikipedia

- "Mother" Jones Mary Harris Jones, better known as Mother Jones (August 1, 1837 November 30, 1930), an outstanding trade union and public figure, activist of the Industrial Workers of the world. Contents 1 Biography ... Wikipedia

V 1212 the so-called Children's Crusade took place, an expedition led by a young seer named Stephen, who inspired the faith in French and German children that with his help, as poor and devoted servants of the Lord, they could return Jerusalem to Christianity. The children went to the south of Europe, but many of them did not even reach the shores of the Mediterranean Sea, but died on the way. Some historians believe that the Children's Crusade was a provocation arranged by slave traders in order to sell the participants in the campaign into slavery.

In May 1212, when the German people's army passed through Koln, in its ranks there were about twenty-five thousand children and adolescents heading to Italy to reach from there by sea Palestine. In chronicles 13th century more than fifty times this campaign is mentioned, which was called the “children's crusade”.

The crusaders boarded ships in Marseilles and partly died from the storm, partly, as they say, the children were sold into Egypt into slavery. A similar movement also swept through Germany, where the boy Nikolai gathered a crowd of children of about 20 thousand. Most of them died or scattered along the way (especially many of them died in the Alps), but some reached Brindisi, from where they were supposed to return; most of them also died. Meanwhile, the English king John, the Hungarian Andrew and, finally, Frederick II of Hohenstaufen, who accepted the cross in July 1215, responded to the new call of Innocent III. The beginning of the Crusade was scheduled for June 1, 1217.

Fifth Crusade (1217-1221)

Case Innocent III(d. July 1216) continued Honorius III. Though Friedrich II postponed the trip John of England died, nevertheless 1217 Significant detachments of crusaders went to the Holy Land, with Andrew of Hungary, duke Leopold VI of Austria and Otto of Meran in charge of; it was the 5th crusade. Military operations were sluggish, and in 1218 King Andrew returned home. Soon new detachments of crusaders arrived in the Holy Land, led by Georg Vidsky and William of Holland(on the way, some of them helped Christians in the fight against Moors v Portugal). The crusaders decided to attack Egypt, which was at that time the main center of Muslim power in Western Asia. A son al-Adil,al-Kamil(al-Adil died in 1218), offered an extremely advantageous peace: he even agreed to the return of Jerusalem to the Christians. This proposal was rejected by the crusaders. In November 1219, after more than a year of siege, the crusaders took Damietta. Removal from the camp of the crusaders Leopold and the king John of Brienne was partly offset by the arrival in Egypt Louis of Bavaria with the Germans. Part of the crusaders, convinced by the papal legate Pelagius, moved to Mansour, but the campaign ended in complete failure, and the crusaders concluded in 1221 with al-Kamil peace, according to which they received a free retreat, but pledged to clear Damietta and Egypt in general. Meanwhile on Isabella, daughters Mary Iolanthe and John of Brienne, married Frederick II of Hohenstaufen. He pledged to the pope to launch a crusade.

Sixth Crusade (1228-1229)

Frederick in August 1227 indeed sent a fleet to Syria with Duke Henry of Limburg at the head; in September, he sailed himself, but had to return to the shore soon, due to a serious illness. Landgrave Ludwig of Thuringia, who took part in this crusade, died almost immediately after landing in Otranto. Dad Gregory IX did not accept Frederick's explanations in respect and pronounced excommunication over him for not fulfilling his vow at the appointed time. A struggle between the emperor and the pope, extremely harmful to the interests of the Holy Land, began. In June 1228, Frederick finally sailed to Syria (the 6th Crusade), but this did not reconcile the pope with him: Gregory said that Frederick (still excommunicated) was going to the Holy Land not as a crusader, but as a pirate. In the Holy Land, Frederick restored the fortifications of Joppa and in February 1229 concluded an agreement with Alcamil: the Sultan ceded Jerusalem, Bethlehem, Nazareth and some other places to him, for which the emperor undertook to help Alcamil against his enemies. In March 1229, Frederick entered Jerusalem, and in May he sailed from the Holy Land. After the removal of Frederick, his enemies began to seek to weaken the power of the Hohenstaufen both in Cyprus, which had been a fief of the empire since the time of Emperor Henry VI, and in Syria. These strife had a very unfavorable effect on the course of the struggle between Christians and Muslims. Relief for the crusaders was brought only by the strife of the heirs of Alcamil, who died in 1238.

In the autumn of 1239, Thibaut of Navarre, Duke Hugh of Burgundy, Count Peter of Brittany, Amalrich of Montfort and others arrived in Acre. And now the crusaders acted discordantly and recklessly and were defeated; Amalrich was taken prisoner. Jerusalem again fell for some time into the hands of an Ayyubid ruler. The alliance of the Crusaders with Emir Ishmael of Damascus led to their war with the Egyptians, who defeated them at Ascalon. After that, many crusaders left the Holy Land. Arriving in the Holy Land in 1240, Count Richard of Cornwall (brother of the English King Henry III) managed to conclude a favorable peace with Eyyub (Melik-Salik-Eyyub) of Egypt. Meanwhile, strife among the Christians continued; barons hostile to the Hohenstaufen gave power over the kingdom of Jerusalem to Alice of Cyprus, while the legitimate king was the son of Frederick II, Conrad. After the death of Alice, power passed to her son, Henry of Cyprus. A new alliance of Christians with Muslim enemies of Eyyub led to the fact that Eyyub called for help from the Khorezm Turks, who in September 1244, shortly before that, took Jerusalem returned to the Christians and terribly devastated it. Since then, the holy city has been forever lost to the crusaders. After the new defeat of the Christians and their allies, Eyub took Damascus and Ascalon. The Antiochians and the Armenians were at the same time obliged to pay tribute to the Mongols. In the West, the crusading zeal cooled down, due to the unsuccessful outcome of the last Campaigns and due to the behavior of the popes, who spent the money collected for the Crusades on the fight against the Hohenstaufen, and declared that with the help of the Holy See against emperor it is possible to free oneself from the vow given earlier to go to the Holy Land. However, the preaching of the Crusade to Palestine continued as before and led to the 7th Crusade. He accepted the cross before others Louis IX French: During a dangerous illness, he vowed to go to the Holy Land. With him went his brothers Robert, Alphonse and Charles, Duke Hugh of Burgundy, c. William of Flanders, c. Peter of Brittany, Seneschal Champagne John Joinville (a well-known historian of this campaign) and many others.

Children's crusade

The famous medievalist historian Jacques Le Goff asked: "Were there children in the medieval West?" If you look closely at works of art, you won't find them there. Later, angels will often be depicted as children and even as playful boys - half angels, half cupids. But in the Middle Ages, angels of both sexes were portrayed only as adults. “When the sculpture of the Virgin Mary had already acquired the features of soft femininity, clearly borrowed from a specific model,” writes Le Goff, “the baby Jesus remained a terrifying-looking freak that interested neither the artist, nor the client, nor the public.” Only at the end of the Middle Ages did the iconographic theme spread, reflecting a new interest in the child. In conditions of the highest infant mortality, this interest was embodied in a feeling of anxiety: the theme of the “Massacre of the Innocents” was reflected in the spread of the holiday of the Innocents, under the “patronage” of which there were shelters for foundlings. However, such shelters appeared no earlier than the 15th century. The Middle Ages hardly noticed the child, having no time either to be touched or to admire him. Leaving the care of a woman, the child immediately found himself thrown into the exhausting rural labor or military training - depending on the origin. In both cases, the transition was carried out very quickly. Medieval epic works about the childhood of legendary heroes - Sid, Roland, etc. - draw heroes as young people, not boys. The child comes into view only with the advent of a relatively small urban family, the formation of a more personal burgher class. According to a number of scientists, the city suppressed and fettered the independence of women. She was enslaved by the hearth, while the child was emancipated and filled the house, school and street.

Le Goff is echoed by the well-known Soviet researcher A. Gurevich. He writes that according to the ideas of the people of the Middle Ages, a person does not develop, but passes from one age to another. This is not a gradually prepared evolution leading to qualitative shifts, but a sequence of internally unrelated states. In the Middle Ages, the child was looked upon as a small adult, and there was no problem of the development and formation of the human personality. F. Aries, who studied the problem of attitudes towards the child in Europe in the Middle Ages and in the initial period of the New Age, writes about the ignorance of the category of childhood in the Middle Ages as a special qualitative state of a person. "Medieval civilization," he argues, is a civilization of adults. Until the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, fine arts saw children as reduced adults, dressed in the same way as adults and built like them. Education is not age-appropriate, and adults and adolescents are taught together. Games, before becoming children's games, were games of chivalry. The child was considered the natural companion of the adult.

Moving away from the primitive age classes with their initiation rites and forgetting the principles of education of antiquity, medieval society for a long time ignored childhood and the transition from it to adulthood. The problem of socialization was considered solved by the act of baptism. Singing love, courtly poetry contrasted it with marital relations. Christian moralists, on the contrary, warned against excessive passion in the relationship between spouses and saw in sexual love a dangerous phenomenon that must be curbed if it cannot be completely avoided. Only with the transition to the New Age, the family began to be considered not as a union between spouses, but as a cell, which was entrusted with socially important functions for raising children. But above all, this is a bourgeois family.

According to Gurevich, in the specific attitude to childhood in the Middle Ages, a special understanding of the human personality is manifested. Man, apparently, is not yet able to realize himself as a single developing entity. His life is a series of states, the change of which is not internally motivated.

A general analysis of the attitude towards children in the Middle Ages will help us understand such an episode as the children's crusade. It is now difficult to imagine that parents would let go of their children, so that they would follow on foot either to Rome or to the Middle East. Maybe for a medieval person there was nothing extraordinary in this? Why shouldn't the little man try to do what the big man can do? After all, the little one is the same son of the Lord as the big one. On the other hand, isn't this whole campaign nothing more than a fairy tale, composed already when they began to compose anything about children in general?

The legendary crusade of children gives an excellent idea of ​​how the mentality of the people of the Middle Ages differed from the worldview of our contemporaries. Reality and fiction in the head of a man of the XIII century were closely intertwined. The people believed in miracles. Moreover, he saw and created them. Now the idea of ​​a children's trip seems wild to us, but at the same time, thousands of people believed in the success of the enterprise. True, we still do not know whether it was or not.

The Crusades were an era in themselves. The most heroic and at the same time one of the most controversial pages in the history of chivalry, the Catholic Church and all of medieval Europe. The event held "to please God" least of all corresponded in its methods not only to Christian ethics, but also to the usual norms of morality.

The beginning of the crusades to the East was due to several serious reasons. First, it is the plight of the peasantry. Oppressed by taxes and duties, having experienced a number of terrible disasters in the form of epidemics of plague and famine over several years (from the late 80s to the mid-90s of the 11th century), the common people were ready to go as far as they liked, just to find a place where they food.

Secondly, the chivalry also experienced hard times. By the end of the 11th century, there were almost no free lands left in Europe. The feudal lords stopped dividing their possessions between their sons, switching to the system of majorat - inheritance only by the eldest son. A large number of poor knights appeared, who, by their origin, did not consider it possible to do anything other than war. They were aggressive, rushed into any adventure, turned out to be mercenaries during numerous civil strife, just engaged in robbery. In the end, they had to be removed from Europe, there was a need to consolidate the chivalry and direct its militant energy somewhere “outside”, to solve external problems, since further effective management of European territories by kings, large feudal lords and the church became very problematic.

The third factor is the ambitions and material claims of the Catholic Church and, first of all, the papacy. The unification of believers by some idea objectively led to the strengthening of the power of Rome, since the idea came from there. The campaign to the East promised "interception" by the pope of the religious initiative in Eastern Europe from Constantinople, strengthening the position of Catholicism.

Also, such a military event promised both the church, and the feudal lords, and even the poor, enormous wealth. Moreover, the churches not only at the expense of, in fact, military booty, but also at the expense of rich donations and European lands of the crusaders who went to war.

The most convenient and, it seems, obvious pretext was a campaign under the banner of war against the "infidels" - that is, with the Muslims. The immediate reason for the start of the campaign was the appeal of the Byzantine emperor Alexei Comnenus for help to Pope Urban II (1088-1099) (his name before taking the papacy was Oddon de Lagerie). The Byzantine Empire suffered from a combined attack on it by the Seljuk Turks and the Pechenegs. Vasilevs addressed the "Latins" as brothers in faith. And without this, since the 70s of the XI century, the idea of ​​the need to liberate the Holy Sepulcher, which was located in Jerusalem captured by the Turks, was in the air. Thus, the eyes of believers, who from the time of Augustine turned to the heavenly Jerusalem, that is, the Kingdom of God, turned to the earthly Jerusalem. The dream of a future heavenly bliss after death is intricately intertwined in the minds of Christians with concrete, earthly rewards for righteous labors. These sentiments were used by the organizers of the crusades.

The Pope lifted the excommunication from the Byzantine Emperor Alexios, which had hitherto been on him as a schismatic. In March 1095, the pontiff once again listened to the ambassadors of Alexei at the cathedral in Piacenza, and in the summer of 1095 Urban II went to France. For some time he negotiated with the southern French monasteries, members of the most influential Cluniac congregation, large feudal lords and authoritative priests. Finally, on November 18, a church council began in the city of Clermont-Ferrand in Auvergne. As often happened, in the city where such an important forum took place, there was a mass of visiting people. In total - about 20 thousand people: knights, peasants, vagabonds, etc. The Council discussed, in general, exclusively church problems. But at the end of it, on November 26, Urban II, not far from the city on a plain in the open air, spoke to the people with a speech, which made Clermont Cathedral so famous.

The pope urged Catholics to take up arms in the war against "the Persian tribe of the Turks ... who reached the Mediterranean ... killed and took away many Christians." The liberation of the Holy Sepulcher was declared a separate task. The Pope tried to present the war as an easy walk, promising rich booty. Jerusalem, according to him, was a place where milk and honey flowed, in the East everyone will receive new lands, which in cramped Europe are not enough for everyone. The pontiff urged to abandon internal strife for the common cause. Urban II was extremely specific and straightforward. Everyone who went on a campaign was forgiven of sins (including future ones - committed during a charitable war). The crusaders could count on getting into paradise. The pope's speech was constantly interrupted by an enthusiastic crowd shouting: "God wants it so!" Many immediately vowed to go on a campaign and attached crosses made of red fabric to their shoulders.

The church took over the protection of the lands (and, of course, the conduct of business) of the departed crusaders, their debts to creditors were declared invalid. The feudal lords who did not want to go on a campaign had to pay off with rich gifts in favor of the clergy.

The news of the beginning of the campaign quickly spread throughout Europe. Probably, the pope himself did not expect such an effect from his speech. Already in the spring of 1096, thousands of poor people from the Rhine lands set off on their journey. Then the knights also moved to the East. Thus began the First Crusade.

In total, united in six large groups, tens of thousands of people made this campaign. First, separate detachments set off, largely composed of the poor, led by Peter the Hermit and the knight Walter Golyak. Their first "charitable" deed was Jewish pogroms in German cities:

Trier, Cologne, Mainz. In Hungary, they also did a lot of trouble. The Balkan Peninsula was plundered by the "Christ warriors".

Then the crusaders arrived in Constantinople. The most numerous detachment moving from southern France was led by Raymond of Toulouse. Bohemond of Tarentum went with his army to the East through the Mediterranean Sea. Robert of Flanders reached the Bosphorus by the same sea route. The number of crusaders who gathered in various ways in Constantinople probably reached 300,000. Byzantine emperor Alexei I was horrified by the prospect of unrestrained looting in the capital that opened before him. And it was not necessary to especially count on the fact that the Latins would only return to him the lands taken by the Muslims. Through bribery and flattery, the emperor won the vassal oath from most of the knights and tried to send them on their way as soon as possible. In April 1097, the crusaders crossed the Bosporus.

The first detachment of Walter Golyak was by that time already defeated in Asia Minor. But other troops that appeared here in the spring of 1097 easily defeated the army of the Nicaean Sultan. In the summer, the crusaders split up: most of them moved towards the Syrian city of Antioch. In early July 1098, after a seven-month siege, the city surrendered. Meanwhile, some French crusaders established themselves in Edessa (now Urfa, Turkey). Baldwin of Boulogne founded his own state here, stretching on both sides of the Euphrates. It was the first crusader state in the East.

In Antioch, the crusaders, in turn, were besieged by the emir of Mosul Kerbuga. Hunger has begun. Being exposed to great danger, they left the city and were able to defeat Kerbuga. After a long quarrel with Raymond, Antioch was taken over by Bohemond, who, even before its fall, managed to force the rest of the crusader leaders to agree to the transfer of this important city to him. Soon, in Asia Minor, a war began between the crusaders and the Greeks of the coastal cities, who hoped to get rid of not only the Muslim dictate, but also the new Western masters.

From Antioch, the crusaders moved south along the coast without any special obstacles and captured several port cities along the way. The way to Jerusalem opened before the knights, but they did not immediately move to the desired city. An epidemic broke out - far from the last during the Crusades. "Christ's army" lost many people every day without any battles. The leaders split up, and their detachments scattered over the surrounding territories. Finally, the departure from Antioch was scheduled for March 1099.

Gottfried of Bouillon and the Count of Flanders set out for Laodicea. The whole army united under the walls of Arhas, the siege of which had already been begun by Raymond. At this time, the ambassadors of the Cairo Caliph, who had recently become the ruler of Jerusalem, arrived to the crusaders. They declared that the gates of the holy city would only open to unarmed pilgrims. This did not affect the plans of the Europeans in any way. Taking Arkhas, they continued to move towards the main goal. At that time, the Christian army numbered up to 50 thousand people. These were already battle-hardened warriors, and not the rabble of the first stage of the crusades. But at Jerusalem, which opened their eyes, they looked with the same childish delight and reverent awe, like any person of that era. The riders dismounted from their horses and walked barefoot; cries, prayers and a thousand times repeated exclamation "Jerusalem!" announced to the district.

The crusaders settled down in three detachments: Gottfried, Robert of Normandy and Robert of Flanders - to the northeast of the city, Tancred - to the northwest, Raymond - to the south. Jerusalem was defended by an Egyptian garrison of 40,000 men. The city thoroughly prepared for the siege: food was prepared, wells were filled up throughout the surrounding area and the bed of the Kidron River. The Knights are in big trouble. They suffered from thirst and heat, there was a treeless space around, they had to send expeditions to remote areas behind the forest, from which huge siege engines, ladders and battering rams were built. Logs were also used, from which rural houses and churches of the area were made. But from Genoa, the merchants promptly sent ships with food and qualified carpenters and engineers.

The Saracens staunchly defended themselves, poured boiling tar on the heads of their opponents, threw stones at them, hit them with arrows. The crusaders resorted to a variety of methods. Once they even made a religious procession around the impregnable fortress. The decisive assault began on July 14, 1099. At night, Gottfried's warriors secretly moved their camp to the eastern part of Jerusalem, which was less protected by the Saracens. At dawn, on a signal, all three parts of the army began to move. From three sides, colossal erratic towers moved towards the walls of Jerusalem. But after a twelve-hour battle, the Muslims managed to repel the enemy. Only the next day, from the tower of Gottfried, a bridge was finally thrown over the wall, along which his soldiers broke into the city. The knights managed to set fire to the defensive devices of the Saracens. Soon both Raymond and Tancred were in Jerusalem. It happened at three o'clock in the afternoon, on Friday, on that day of the week and at the time when the Savior died on the cross.

A terrible massacre and no less terrible robbery began in the city. For a week, the "pious" conquerors destroyed about 70 thousand people. And they, with prayers and sobs, with bare feet and bare heads, atoned for sins in the Church of the Resurrection in front of the Tomb of Christ.

Soon, in a battle with a large Egyptian army at Ascalon, the united crusading army defended its main conquest. The crusaders took possession of most of the eastern coast of the Mediterranean. Four states were created on the occupied territory by the knights: the kingdom of Jerusalem, the county of Tripoli, the principality of Antioch and the county of Edessa. Chief among the rulers was King Gottfried of Jerusalem, but the rest behaved quite independently. The rule of the Latins, however, was short-lived.

From the very beginning, the Crusades were a gamble. Huge heterogeneous troops under the leadership of often feuding ambitious kings, counts and dukes, with an ever-decreasing religious zeal, thousands of kilometers from their homeland, had to experience insurmountable difficulties. And if during the first campaign the Europeans managed to stun the Muslims with their pressure, then they could not create a solid system of state administration here, and then they could not defend their conquests.

In 1137, the Byzantine Emperor John II attacked and captured Antioch. In 1144, the strong emir of Mosul, Imad-ad-din Zengi, took the county of Edessa, an outpost of the Christian world in the East. Difficult times have come for other knightly states. From all sides they were attacked by Syrians, Seljuks and Egyptians. The king of Jerusalem lost control of his own vassal princes.

Naturally, the fall of Edessa was to be a heavy blow for the Christians. This event caused a particularly great resonance in France. King Louis VII the Young was quite romantic and at the same time militant. He was seized with a thirst for exploits, which he had heard about since childhood. This impulse was supported by Pope Eugene III, and one of the most authoritative confessors of Europe - the abbot of Clairvaux Bernard, a supporter of strict morals, a teacher of both Eugene, and abbot Suger - an influential adviser to Louis. In the city of Wesel in Burgundy, Bernard convened a council, at which, in the presence of the king, on March 31, 1146, he delivered a fiery speech, calling on all Christians to rise up to fight against the infidels. “Woe to him whose sword is not stained with blood,” said the preacher. Immediately, many, and, first of all, Louis, laid crosses on themselves as a sign of readiness to go on a new campaign. Bernard soon arrived in Germany, where, after some struggle, he managed to persuade King Conrad III to support the new undertaking.

From the very beginning of the campaign (spring of 1147), the Germans and French coordinated their actions poorly, each pursuing their own goals. So, the French wanted to move to the East by sea, using the help of the Norman king of Sicily, Roger, while the Germans agreed with the Byzantine emperor Manuel and were going to move by land through Hungary and the Balkans. Conrad's point of view won, and the angry Roger, already at enmity with Byzantium over southern Italy, made an alliance with the African Muslims and made a series of devastating raids on the Greek coast and islands.

The Germans were the first to reach Constantinople in September 1147, just like the last time, having managed to inspire horror with their looting along the way. Manuel, like Alexei Komnenos, did everything possible to quickly bring the Latins to Asia Minor. On October 26, the Germans suffered a crushing defeat at the hands of the Iconian sultan near Dorileus in Anatolia. Returning to Nicaea, many thousands of Germans died of starvation. But the warriors of Louis, who arrived in the Byzantine capital a little later, Manuel told about the amazing successes of Conrad, causing them to envy. Soon the French also ended up in Asia Minor. At Nicaea, the armies of the kings met and continued their journey together. Trying to get around the places of the recent Dorylean tragedy, the monarchs led the troops in a difficult detour through Pergamon and Smyrna. The Turkish cavalry constantly disturbed the columns, the crusaders lacked fodder and food. The matter was complicated and slowed down by the fact that Louis VII took with him a large retinue, completely inappropriate in a difficult campaign, a magnificent court headed by his beautiful wife, Eleanor of Aquitaine. The help of the Byzantine army turned out to be insufficient - apparently, Emperor Manuel, in the depths of his soul, wished for the defeat of the crusaders. On July 3, 1147, a fierce battle broke out near the village of Hittin, west of Lake Genisaret. The Muslim army outnumbered the Christian forces. As a result, the crusaders suffered a crushing defeat. Countless of them were killed in battle, and the survivors were taken prisoner. In the hands of the Christians there were only a few powerful fortresses in the north: Krak-de-Chevalier, Châtel Blanc and Margat.

At the beginning of 1148, a greatly depleted crusading army arrived in Ephesus. From here, Louis with great difficulty, having endured a series of battles, cold and heavy rains, reached Antioch in March 1148. The last part of the way his army did on Byzantine ships. In Antioch, the French received a warm welcome, festivities and celebrations. Eleanor struck up an intrigue with the local ruler. Louis VII lost all enthusiasm, and his army - the necessary fighting spirit.

Meanwhile, Konrad no longer thought about joint actions with his ally. With Jerusalem's King Baldwin III, he agreed to speak not against the Emir of Mosul - the powerful offender of Edessa, for which, it seemed, the whole campaign was started - but against Damascus. The French monarch was forced to join them. The 50,000-strong Christian army spent a lot of time under the walls of the Syrian capital. Its leaders quickly quarreled among themselves, suspecting each other of treason and of wanting to capture most of the potential booty. The attack on Damascus prompted its ruler to conclude an alliance with another Muslim feudal lord, the prince of Aleppo. The combined forces of the Muslims forced the crusaders to retreat from Damascus.

In the autumn of 1148, on Byzantine ships, the Germans left for Constantinople, and from there they left for Germany. Louis also did not dare to continue military operations. At the beginning of 1149, the French crossed over to southern Italy on Norman ships, and in the autumn of that year they were already at home.

The second crusade turned out to be a completely useless undertaking. In addition to numerous losses, he did not bring anything to his leaders and initiators - neither glory, nor wealth, nor lands. The abbot of Clairvaux, for whom the defeat of the campaign was a personal tragedy, even wrote a "justification" in which he attributed the disasters of the war to the crimes of Christians.

During the Second Crusade, some feudal lords organized similar local events in Europe. So, the Saxons attacked the Slavic tribes between the Elbe and the Oder, and a number of French, Norman and English knights intervened in Spanish affairs, fought against the Moors and captured Lisbon, which became the capital of Christian Portugal.

If you can imagine an "all-star match" in the Middle Ages, then it is quite possible to call it the Third Crusade. Almost all the bright characters of that time, all the most powerful rulers of Europe and the Middle East took a direct part in it. Richard the Lionheart, Philip II Augustus, Frederick Barbarossa, Saladin. Everyone is a personality, everyone is an era, everyone is a hero of his time.

After the Second Crusade, things went from bad to worse for Christians in the East. The outstanding statesman and talented commander Sultan Saladin became the leader and hope of the Muslim world. First, he came to power in Egypt, then subjugated Syria and other territories in the east. In 1187 Saladin took Jerusalem. The news of this was the signal for the start of another crusade. The Roman legates managed to convince the powerful sovereigns of France, England and Germany - Philip, Richard and Frederick to move to the East.

The German emperor chose the already well-known route through Hungary and the Balkan Peninsula for movement. His crusaders, led by the wise and practical 67-year-old Barbarossa, were the first to set out on the campaign in the spring of 1189. Naturally, relations between the Germans and the Byzantines traditionally deteriorated as soon as the Latins ended up on the territory of Byzantium. Skirmishes began, a diplomatic scandal erupted. Frederick seriously thought about the siege of Constantinople, but in the end everything was more or less resolved and the German army crossed into Asia Minor. She was slowly but surely moving south, when the irreparable happened. While crossing the Salef River, the emperor drowned. This event made a depressing impression on the pilgrims. Many of them returned home. The rest moved to Antioch.

The French and the British agreed to act together. The cunning and subtle diplomat Philip from the time of the wars against Henry II Plantagenet was on the most friendly terms with the young English king Richard I. The latter was the complete opposite of Philip. State affairs interested him insofar as. He was much more interested in war, exploits, glory. The first knight of his time, physically strong, brave Richard the Lionheart was a short-sighted politician and a bad diplomat. But so far, before the campaign, the friendship of the monarchs seemed unshakable. It took them some time to prepare, within the framework of which a special tax was established in their countries for all segments of the population - the so-called Saladin tithe. Richard was particularly diligent in raising money. It was said that the king would sell London if there was a buyer for it. As a result, a sizable army gathered under his command.

Philip Augustus and Richard set out on a campaign in the spring of 1190. Their path lay through Sicily. Already here the fragility of their union was revealed. Richard laid claim to this island. He began hostilities against the Sicilians (more precisely, the Normans who owned the kingdom), because of which he quarreled with the more peaceful Philip. Finally the British and French moved on. Philip's troops safely reached the eastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea, and the British were overtaken by a storm that nailed them to the shores of Cyprus. Richard conquered the island from the usurper Isaac Komnenos and declared it his possession. Soon he pledged it to the Templars. It was not until June 1191 that the English forces arrived at Acre.

The main events were unfolding near this seaside Syrian city. Actually, the fortress was not supposed to be of great strategic value to Christians. At first (back in 1189), the Christian ruler of Jerusalem, Guido Lusignan, deprived of his city, got involved in the struggle for it. Gradually, all detachments from Europe, who came one by one, joined him. One by one, they were crushed by Muslims. The siege dragged on, near Acre grew, in fact, a Christian knightly city. Acre was well defended, with food and reinforcements coming in by sea from Egypt and by land from Mesopotamia. Saladin was outside the city and constantly raided the besiegers. The crusader troops suffered from disease and heat. The arrival of new forces, and especially Richard, inspired the crusaders to more energetic fighting. Undermines were dug, siege towers were built ... Finally, in July 1191, the fortress was taken.

The usual strife prevented the crusaders from developing success in the east. A dispute arose over the candidacy of the new king of Jerusalem. Philip supported the hero of the defense of Tyre, Conrad of Montferatt, Richard played for Guido Lusignan. There were problems with the division of production. The episode with Leopold of Austria was evidence of fierce contradictions. He hoisted his banner over one of the towers of Acre, and Richard ordered it to be torn down. Then miraculously managed to avoid a bloody clash of Christians among themselves. Philip, dissatisfied and irritated by the actions of Richard, and simply considered his mission accomplished, departed for France. The English king remained the sole leader of the crusader host. He did not receive full confidence and approval for his actions. His relationship with Saladin was inconsistent. The Sultan was distinguished by great political tact and many truly chivalrous qualities that even Europeans appreciated in him. He willingly negotiated, but when Richard was nice to the enemy, he was suspected of treason. When he took more drastic steps, the Christians also had every reason to be dissatisfied. So, after the capture of Acre, the knights presented Saladin with conditions that were too difficult for him to ransom the Muslim hostages: the return of all the occupied territories, money, the Tree of the Cross ... Saladin hesitated. Then the enraged Richard ordered the death of two thousand Muslims - an action that horrified their fellow believers. In response, the Sultan ordered the death of the Christian captives.

From Acre, Richard moved not to Jerusalem, but to Jaffa. This path was very difficult. Saladin constantly disturbed the knightly columns. A great battle took place at Arzuf. Here Richard showed himself as an amazingly brave warrior and a good commander. The knights utterly defeated the numerically superior enemy. But the king failed to take advantage of the results of this victory. The English monarch and the sultan in 1192 made peace, which did not at all meet the goals of the campaign. Jerusalem remained in the hands of the Muslims, although it was open to peaceful Christians - pilgrims. Only a narrow coastal strip remained in the hands of the crusaders, starting north of Tire and reaching Jaffa. Richard, returning home, was captured in Austria by Leopold, who held a grudge against him, and spent two years in prison.

The Fourth Crusade clearly showed what goals the crusader army actually pursues and what its Christian piety is worth. No wonder Pope John Paul II had to apologize relatively recently to the Patriarch of Constantinople for the actions of the knights in the distant 13th century.

The initiator of the next campaign was the active Pope Innocent III. In 1198, he began to agitate Western sovereigns and feudal lords to go again to liberate the Holy Sepulcher. The powerful monarchs of England and France this time ignored Innocent's proposal, but several feudal lords nevertheless decided to take part in the campaign. These were Thibaut of Champagne, Boniface, Margrave of Montferatt, Simon de Montfort, Baudouin of Flanders and others.

The crusaders agreed with the pope that the army should first go not to Syria and Palestine, but to Egypt, from where the Muslim world drew its strength. Since the knights did not have a large fleet, they turned to the leading maritime power of that time - the Venetian Republic. From the very beginning of the crusades, the rich merchant cities of Italy took an active part in their organization. The Genoese, Pisans and Venetians transported supplies and people, being interested not only in a specific reward for these services, but also in strengthening their influence in the Eastern Mediterranean to the detriment of the interests of competitors: the Arabs and Byzantium. In 1201, the elderly (he was over 90 years old!) Doge of Venice Enrico Dandolo promised to transport 25,000 crusaders to Egypt and bring them supplies for 85,000 marks and half of the future booty for three years. In May of the same year, Boniface of Montferatt, a practical and cynical man, became the leader of the crusaders. He and Dandolo soon pushed Pope Innocent out of the leadership of the campaign and focused on their own interests, different from the original goals of the campaign.

The crusaders gathered in a camp on the island of Lido, a few kilometers from Venice. It quickly became clear that the crusaders did not have enough money to pay for food. Then the Doge agreed with Boniface that the soldiers of Christ would pay Venice a favor - they would capture the rich city of Zadar on the Dalmatian coast, which then belonged to Hungary. Only a few knew about the agreement. All the crusaders were put on ships in the autumn of 1202, and a month later they landed not at Egypt, but at Zadar, which the irritated knights easily took.

The Byzantine prince Alexei Angel arrived at the knights. His father Isaac, who was in alliance with the German emperor, was shortly before that deposed and blinded by Alexei III Comnenus. The prince managed to escape, and now he asked for help from the crusaders. And for this he promised a rich reward, assistance in the campaign to the Holy Land and, finally, the restoration of the unity of the Greek and Roman Christian churches. So there was a reason to go to Constantinople. This idea was actively supported by Boniface and Dandolo. The Venetians had a grudge against the Byzantines for a long time. In trade and maritime relations, they were stronger and had great privileges in Constantinople for a long time, but more and more often misunderstandings arose between the Venetian merchants and the emperor, which cost the Italians great losses.

On June 23, 1203, the crusaders arrived at the Bosporus and landed on the Asian coast, near Chalcedon. Then they crossed over to Galata and made a fortified camp here. The Venetian ships, having broken through the famous chain that blocked the entrance, broke into the Golden Horn Bay. By this time, the knightly host numbered about 40 thousand people, but due to illness, desertion and military losses, only about 15 thousand participated in the final division of booty.

Actually, there was no siege as such - all actions were concentrated on a relatively small section of the city fortifications. The walls seemed absolutely impregnable. Over the past seven centuries, they have repeatedly defended the city from the Huns, Bulgarians, Slavs, Arabs and Turks, whose armies greatly outnumbered those with which Dandolo and Boniface were besieging. But Constantinople did not have a sufficient number of defenders. In addition, in July, Alexei III fled the capital. Isaac returned to the throne. He and his son were in no hurry to fulfill their obligations to the Latins. The same behaved more and more impudently towards the locals, causing general hatred. It ended with the fact that the power in the capital in January 1204 was seized by an ardent opponent of the crusaders Alexei Duka, Alexei Angel was thrown into prison and killed. When asked by Western feudal lords whether the new emperor was going to pay the amount promised by his predecessors, he refused. The crusaders had another pretext for the capture of Constantinople.

In March, Boniface of Montferatt and Dandolo drew up a detailed plan of action, from which they did not deviate a single step. According to the agreement, the knights were to take Constantinople by storm and establish Latin rule in it. The city was to be plundered and all booty amicably divided between Venice and the French. The territory of the country was divided between them and the newly elected Latin emperor. The decisive assault began on 9 April. Constantinople was taken on April 12, 1204. This date can be considered the true end of the Byzantine Empire, although it was formally restored after sixty years, after which it existed for another two centuries.

The crusaders staged a three-day bloody orgy in Constantinople. They killed, robbed, raped. Eyewitnesses of the events, even from the side of the Latins, described these three days with horror. The knights burned libraries, destroyed priceless works of art, took out shrines from churches, did not spare either the elderly or children. And all this happened in a Christian city, as part of the Fourth Crusade, declared to fight the "infidels"! On the territory of Byzantium, the Latin Empire was formed.

During the entire time of the Fourth Crusade, in fact, only small detachments of those leaders who at one time refused to join the crusaders in Venice arrived in the Holy Land from Europe. But these few hundred knights could do little to help their co-religionists. Their army made several minor punitive expeditions against the Muslim emir in the vicinity of Sidon, and the fleet sacked the Egyptian city of Fuwu in the Nile Delta. As a result of these actions, in September 1204, a peace treaty was signed for a period of six years: the Christians were returned to Jaffa, taken from them in 1197, half of the territory of Sidon, part of the city of Nazareth. In general, the Fourth Campaign only weakened the Christian East. The emerging Latin Empire divided forces: Constantinople absorbed part of the subsidies intended for the Holy Land, attracted soldiers who could go to Syria.

In our opinion, there is nothing surprising in the fact that the story of the children's crusade was attributed to the time of Pope Innocent III mentioned above. His personality is highly curious. The pope was distinguished by indomitable energy, ambition, apparently, a sincere conviction that he was doing a just cause, devotion to the Catholic Church. During his time on the papal throne, Innocent III organized many large-scale events. He interfered in the affairs of sovereigns throughout Europe, his hands reached out to England, the Baltic states, Galicia ... The pope considered his main goal to consolidate the dominion of the popes over Europe.

Innocent III (his name before the adoption of the tiara by Giovanni-Lothair Conti) succeeded Celestine III on the papal throne on January 8, 1198. It is curious that before that he was not even a bishop, he was only 38 years old, but the cardinals already considered him the best contender for the Holy See.

The pope immediately began to deal with the enemies of the throne. To begin with, he dealt with the Roman aristocrats, while using the full support of the ordinary urban population, among whom he was unusually popular. Then Innocent turned to Italian affairs, where the Germans traditionally fought with him for influence. German barons, planted in different cities of the Apennine Peninsula by Emperor Henry VI, were forced to leave the Papal States. The Florentine cities formed an independent union, but papal sympathies were strong there too. Less than a year later, the Papal States, under the leadership of Innocent III, reached the greatest extent in all previous history. After Italy came the turn of the rest of Europe. As the historian N. Osokin writes: “For Innocent, in the whole West there was no person too poor, too insignificant, and, conversely, too influential a ruler.” That is why he boldly entered into confrontation with the most powerful sovereigns, making extensive use of the moods in the lower classes, exploiting their religiosity, and, at times, ignorance and militancy.

In fulfilling his plans in relation to the rulers of contemporary Europe, Innocent met with strong resistance. Influence in Germany, England, France, Leon (one of the Spanish kingdoms), Portugal, and finally, the rebellious Languedoc (a region in southern France), the pope strengthened after a hard struggle with politicians and the spirit of national identity.

In Germany, there was complete confusion: there was a struggle for the imperial throne. The hopes of the parties were also connected with the actions of Innocent III, much depended on which of the three applicants he would support: Philip Hohenstaufen, Friedrich Hohenstaufen or Otto IV, Duke of Brunswick, leader of the Welf party. Philip and Otto were elected to the throne by the German princes almost simultaneously, each with his own party. A war broke out between rivals. At first, no attention was paid to the direct heir, the son of the last emperor, Frederick. Innocent, after much deliberation, spoke out in favor of Otto, against whom almost all of central and southern Germany protested. His opponents sent a rather harsh protest to the pope. “Perhaps the holy curia,” wrote the authors of this document, “in her parental tenderness considers us an addition to the Roman Empire. If so, then we cannot but declare the injustice of all this ... ”But the Curia thought exactly that, so Innokenty continued to defend his point of view. In favor of Philip, his namesake spoke - the French king, who had just been humiliated by the pontiff, which will be discussed below. The situation was resolved in favor of Otto rather unexpectedly. On June 23, 1208, Philip Hohenstaufen was killed by his personal enemy - one of the German feudal lords. Otto, however, did not live up to the pope's hopes. In 1210, he tried to capture the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, which included a significant part of the Apennine Peninsula, and was excommunicated. This once again showed that the differences between the pontificate and the Holy Roman Empire are systemic. Whoever came to power in the empire, he invariably came into conflict with the pope over the right to interfere in the affairs of the church in his country and claims to certain disputed territories.

Much more harshly, Innocent III put in place the recalcitrant English monarch, who was the notorious John the Landless, a king who did not want to share his power with anyone, even with the Catholic Church. In 1205, John attempted to reverse the papal approval of the new Archbishop of Canterbury, head of the English Church. As a result, Innocent imposed an interdict on England. For a medieval person, the cessation of all rituals and celebrations, the closure of temples was a disaster. For some time the English king fought: he ordered to seize, expel, hang and cut those clerics who obeyed the interdict. He confiscated their estates, encouraged robbery, but achieved only that he further revolted the population of the country. In 1212, Innocent removed John from the throne and freed the English feudal lords from the vassal oath to their king. The anger of the monarch was replaced by servility. He gave up England in favor of Rome and received it back from the pope with the obligation of a large annual tribute.

The pope did not limit himself to England and Germany. It was under Innokenty that the conquests of the Teutonic Order began on the territory of the settlement of the Prussians and the Order of the Sword-bearers in the lands of the Livs. Both in Prussia and in Livonia, the crusades were accompanied by merciless devastation of the lands. The pope also fought for strengthening his influence in Spain.

One of the strongest opponents of Innocent at one time was the outstanding French monarch Philip II Augustus. Then came the time of the power of royal power, there was a process of unification of the French lands. Philip II successfully fought the British for the vast territories in France that he had ceded under Eleanor of Aquitaine, got into his own hands the possessions of the feudal lords who went on crusades to the east, and established relations with the cities that he brought out of the rule of the barons. Much has been done in the field of administrative and economic structure of the state. Such a king was naturally opposed to Rome having a great deal of influence in French affairs. The reason for the clash between Philip and Innocent was the marriage problems of the king. The latter did not love his wife Ingeborg, the sister of the Danish King Knut. When Pope Celestine III refused Philip's request for a divorce, the king ordered Ingeborg to be locked up in a monastery, and he married the daughter of one of the Tyrolean princes. Having come to power, Innocent resolutely led the fight for the fulfillment of the papal order. In January 1200, the French clergy gathered for a council in Vienne. The legate of the pope announced that France was committed to excommunication for the sins of her king. Philip II Augustus was forced to yield. In 1202 the excommunication was lifted. It is said that the king bitterly said: "How happy Saladin is that he does not have a pope." Ingeborg was returned to court. But the French monarch harbored a hatred of Rome and was certainly not a reliable subject of the Curia.

Innocent III had certain hopes for establishing his influence in Byzantium. It was during the reign of this pontiff that the bloody Fourth Crusade was organized, during which the crusaders defeated Constantinople. However, the pope was dissatisfied with their cruelty. Having learned about the wild atrocities of the French and Venetians, he punished the perpetrators with an excommunication bull. But Innocent himself became the organizer of the no less bloody Albigensian campaign in the south of France, during which it was with his permission that the Inquisition began to operate. It is curious that King Philip did not personally participate in the wars against heretics. The battles with the Albigensians at the first stage were fought, in fact, by Rome and the crusading army recruited by it. It is unlikely that the French king was delighted with the fact that a foreign army was in charge of his kingdom.

Thus, the crusade of children, allegedly taking place in 1212, may be most directly related to the history of Innocent's struggle with the German and French rulers. We are again dealing with some churchly called, organized and probably armed groups that gather in Germany and France and march along the roads of the domains of disobedient monarchs. Their goals in this case can be divided into formal and actual. Just as the participants of the Fourth Crusade went to Egypt, and sailed to Dalmatia, the participants of the "children's" campaign went to the Holy Land, and reached Marseilles. And, perhaps, both the French and the Germans. The French even carried a letter addressed to Philip II Augustus. What was in this document, what did the legates who secretly directed the campaign want to achieve? Speeches of the king's regular forces in the Middle East? Their participation in the Albigensian War? Full subordination of the king to the pope? Or maybe the monarch was preparing another attempt to remove the church from solving the state problems of France, and the procession of many thousands served as a preventive measure that kept him from this step? After all, since the pontiff can place colossal masses of commoners under his banner (in addition to the main part of the "children's army", local formations marched along the roads of France), is it possible to fight Rome?

“A foolish mind leads a child to the shore...” Children's Crusade 1212 To believe or not to believe in the biblical story about the sea that parted before Moses is a personal matter for everyone. But the thousands of children who, singing hymns, walked through the streets of Marseille straight to the sea, undoubtedly believed in it. They